Andrew Ackner Admits To Spamming My Blog

Well, Andrew Ackner has waived his 5th Amendment rights and publicly admitted to writing all those horrendous comments on my blog. He didn't realize that Phil can't block IPs from his blog lobby, so he wouldn't have admitted to it otherwise. He also claimed that it would be inadmissible evidence because he thought I was blocked, but that isn't true either. In fact, it is a crime to cover up evidence that could implicate you. That is called "obstruction of justice," and is partially what Bill Clinton got impeached for although he was acquitted due to insufficient evidence as well as the fact that the Republicans lacked a supermajority in the Senate. Anyway, Andrew had the right to remain silent under the 5th Amendment, but he voluntarily gave up that right, so as per Miranda v. Arizona, anything he says can and would be used against him in a court of law if I followed up. I don't think I will (because I have better shit to do), but if you are stupid enough to give up your constitutional rights, you shouldn't expect much good to happen. Also, even though Andrew was directly responsible for his horrendous comments, Phil was indirectly responsible as well. The fact that he did not publicly disown Andrew for those means that he endorses them and thus is indirectly responsible. One does not actually have to type on the keyboard. For example, one can get the death penalty for murder in California even if he did not pull the trigger, so it is the same principle albeit less severe in nature.