Thursday, December 2, 2010
Long Beach State Cites My Blog
I received a text message from Aspie Al last night, and he informed me that a student at Long Beach State cited my blog in a paper about people with disabilities. I've never gotten that kind of recognition before, especially from a random college student whom I've never met. This proves that my blog is being recognized as a legitimate source, and that Phil's World isn't. It is an honor to be included in a college paper written by someone I've never met, someone who hopefully shares my belief that autism is a horrendous disease that needs to be cured. Hopefully, one citation will lead to another, and this will spread the correct belief that autism is a horrendous disease and needs to be cured. There are sane people out there, I know there are, so show yourself, and speak out against autism. The more voices we have, we can defeat neurodiversity, and we can have a world of peace and harmony that is free of autism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
congratulations!
You don't know in what light he portrayed the blog, so I wouldn't be asking for high-fives if I were you yet.
I don't know, if he says in his paper that you are a rambling idiot that doesn't say much good for the credibility of this blog. Or if he does use you as a valid source, which I doubt he did, then if he gets a shitty grade, that doesn't prove your credibility either.
Have you written a college paper??
No you haven't. First of all, almost every disciplines at the college level expect opinion papers because a paper that points out facts isn't worth writing. Everything is argumentative, a thesis one of the most important components of a paper isn't a statement of fact, it's a statement of argument. More evidence that you aren't academically worthy of a high school diploma.
Also in a college level paper, the writer would be expected to deal with texts that disagree with his thesis and explain either their invalidity, mootness or lesser degrees of importance compared to the points their claim won. While he wouldn't have flat-out called you a rambling idiot, because that would be poor-writing, he would take apart every single major detail of this blog and proved that you are a rambling idiot who lies frequently and has no earthly idea of what it is your talking about. If he was arguing a pro-cure thesis he would've used Age Of Autism because at least they seem credible.
And if he does have a pro-cure paper and does receive a poor grade that doesn't necessarily mean it's because his sources were not reliable but an important part of a paper is backing from reliable resources and if the sources aren't good a shitty grade results. And whether or not it would be because he cited this blog, you can't claim him citing you as evidence that you have a academically valid blog, because obviously the paper that cited you was a failure.
Again what makes you knowledgeable of jackshit in how Professors grade papers?
First of all John Best hates Age Of Autism not because they're fringe lunatics but because they aren't fringe enough. I think they're fringe lunatics but at least they aren't a little turd who rants without clearly any knowledge of things he talks about. Take advice from your own party Canby, "let the adults take care of this."
you're going to go to Hell if said Hell exists.
" I know bullshit when I see it, and my blog is the biggest load of bullshit you'll come around in a long time."
And I will take that as a confession that you are a lying sack of shit who has constantly lied since the beginning. Tell me, Ollie who are people going to believe? You with all of your bullshit? Or me who may have a reputation as a loose-cannon but also is known to be honest, and is backed entirely by the people who gave me that award whom are reputible unlike your sorry ass.
Ollie said:
"Age of Autism is just a bunch of fringe lunatics who hold so dearly to the mercury theory when we should be focusing on other theories as the cause of autism."
That's right, they are lunatics, believing in the theory of mercury causing autism, even though proven wrong so many times.
And what is it you want to chelate from yourself?
Face it, Ollie, you don't make any sense. You still haven't bothered to get your piddling ALA, will never get the EDTA treatment, and you wouldn't last 2 minutes into getting a tattoo. (They're screamingly painful.)
Ollie said:
"At least they don't focus on the refrigerator mom theory like you do."
You're just going by what that other paragon of illogic (Mitchell) said, not what I actually said. Here's what I said about Jonboy's foolish accusation that I support a refrigerator theory:
Now surely, even he must know that Bettelheim's "theory" proposed that it was the effect of the "refrigerator mother" on her child that causes autism. He should know that I have never said that his mother was cold, or that anything she did or didn't do caused his autism. Yes, I have postulated that his mother did indeed teach him to hate himself, that she did not accept him "as is", but continually made every effort she could to "improve" him, whether with treatments, drugs, anything she could find to make him more acceptable to her as a son. I believe that is contemptible, on her part, and I don't blame him at all for that, but am very sorry that that was his reality for so long. I believe that she was a manipulative, "take charge" kind of person, and yes, domineering, and it's very easy to dominate someone who is so dependent on her.
It's made him such a "basket case", he can't reason out that my saying that his mother was domineering, manipulative, and unaccepting of him is not the same thing as calling her a "refrigerator mother" who caused his autism by being so. Clearly, the man can't think his way out of a paper bag!"
And neither can you, pal. Like Mitchell, you can't keep two facts straight in your mind. Nobody in "ND" believes in the refrigerator mother theory, because autism is something inherent in a person, not caused by what sort of mother one has.
Mitchell was born autistic, no doubt, but what made him such a loser is his attitude about it, which he learned from his mother.
despite giving a GMP award to a convicted pedophile
Link us to the court decision where it says that Dubin has been convicted. Until that decision has been made - there is NO conviction.
Understand? Opinions like yours (and Zach Lassiter's) do not count. You are not a judge or jury on the matter, and he only confessed to downloading material. There is no official decision (yet) as to why.
That is all.
Ollie said:
"Blaming Norma Mitchell for Jonathan's autism is the exact same thing as believing in the refrigerator mom theory."
I'll bet that whenever Mitchell reads this, he'll curse you for being such a dumbfuck simpleton as to reveal his mother's name. And you can't follow an argument worth a shit. Again, nothing his mother did or didn't do his autism, he was already autistic. He knew that she considered him as "broken", and he adopted her attitude that autism is a tragedy, and that he needed to be "fixed". All the treatments she tried did no good, and so he still feels like a failure, a disappointment. Just a sad outlook on life.
I don't know why it is that you don't understand that you can't say someone has been convicted until they have actually been convicted. Don't worry your little head about it, the case is in the hands of the court, and they will do what's best, based on evidence.
It's nice that your parents are supportive. I'm sure they will continue to support you all your life, because you're gonna need it!
You're a hopeless case, Ollie. Nothing gets through that thick head of yours. You're so unable to think, you couldn't even get a job cleaning tables at a McDonald's.
Keep having fun on your nonsense blog, 'cause that's all you'll ever have. Bye!
You don't know anything about me. My IQ is 150, and you're a mental midget. They wouldn't hire you at McDonald's, not after a short interview with you.
You've said repeatedly, "We all know that Aspies can't go to college", now you say you could? No, you never will.
I have TWO Honorable Discharges from the Navy, was married for 15 years, and had two kids. I worked at many different jobs over 45 years, and am now happily retired.
You, on the other hand, don't know your ass from your elbow.
This is the last thing I have to say to you before I ultimately file suit against you. There are just a few questions that I want to leave with you until then.
How many years can a mountain exist before it is washed to the sea? How many years can some people exist before they're allowed to be free How many times can a man turn his head and pretend that he just doesn't see?
Well of course, I wouldn't sue you if my life was on the line, I'd be too busy trying to save my ass from whatever peril it was in.
Btw Katie Kagan told me to tell you to fuck off. That you're a douchebag and she doesn't want to hear from you.
I wasn't quoting her verbatum, but the fact of the matter is she told me that she can't stand you, and wants you to leave her alone, and asked me if I could get you to stop bothering her. I told her that I'd do my best but you don't listen because you managed to convince yourself that people like instead of hate you.
She was pretty pissed and offended when you said "Good luck with your Big Pharma exam." And I don't blame her. Just admit that you're a tool and that you need to stop talking to her, because she doesn't like you.
I'm not spewing bullshit. I just gave a driect quote of a private message she told me you sent her, and how she felt about it.
No you don't.
Way to go, Oliver! Say, you never sent me a draft. You said awhile ago you wanted to write something for AoA and that you were gonna submit something to me to proofread but I never got it! Do you still plan on submitting anything?
Post a Comment