Friday, October 22, 2010
Nick Dubin Is A Homosexual Faggot And A Pedophile Ta Boot
Well, as everyone knows by now, Nick Dubin has been arrested for downloading gay child porn onto his computer. He posted bond and was released at his own accordance. Not only does this make him a fag, but it also makes him a pedophile, and proves he lied about being autistic just so he could sexually molest little boys. Jonathan wrote a fictional story regarding this called "A Calculated Risk," but no one in a million years believed it'd actually come true. This essentially proves what we knew all along about neurodiversity; that they are a bunch of pedophiles who recruit autistic children for the purpose of sexual abuse. They also teach that cracking down on pedophiles is a "human rights violation" because number 1, they believe that being autistic should be an excuse to get away with murder (no joke), and number 2, they are admittedly modeled after the gay rights movement, and consider throwing pedophiles in jail to be discriminatory against homosexuality. This has to stop, for all of our sake. We need to teach people that autism needs to be cured, is not simply a "different way of being," and that it is not a "human rights violation" to cure it but rather a moral and legal duty, on all of our part. We cannot have any more autistic people in this world if they all turn into pedophiles and then try to use their autism as an excuse. As an autistic person myself, I am absolutely appalled that one of our own would become a pedophile, and then blame it on "neurodiversity." Anyone who subscribes to that ludicrous philosophy needs to know that autism needs to be cured for the betterment of society. I believe that real autistic people will accept that this is true and that their disease needs to be cured, and I am relieved to know that there are many of them out there. While I am not a pedophile, I believe that my disease (autism) should be cured, and I am currently working toward that goal. Sorry for the lack of posts in recent weeks, I've just had so much shit on my mind. Peace out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
39 comments:
Do you proofread your own writing Oliver? Because when you make an assumption out of a given statement, like Nick Dubin (whom is a friend of mine) downloading child pornography, the assumptions you make out of it, have to have some backing somewhere to justify their validity.
Nick Dubin downloaded child porn, which is a disgusting thing to get off on, and is not something anybody believes to be descriminatory to punish. "Neurodiversity" does not support this, and wants him to be prosecuted to the full extent for his crimes just like everyone else.
"if they all turn into pedophiles and then try to use their autism as an excuse."
I'm glad you assume that you will end up a pedophile if you don't get cured, me, I'm not a total jackass.
"I am absolutely appalled that one of our own would become a pedophile, and then blame it on "neurodiversity.""
... Ummmm... he hasn't blamed it on "Neurodiversity." He hasn't made any comment to anybody. I'm one of his best friends he hasn't even returned my call, so you're talking out your ass when it comes to what he's blaming.
"They're doing it with Zakh Price."
They should be because the school committed the crime not Price.
"and now they're doing it with Nick Dubin."
No they're not, if you notice most people who are Autistic Advocates are bashing him as much as everyone else. He is being completely disavowed.
"They don't bother to address any real autistic issues, such as the need for a cure."
Maybe because it isn't a real autistic issue??
"and to make sure we suffer and are thrown into a mental institution."
Just like how Jon Stewart didn't know that he as a Progressive wanted to control every aspect of everyone's life. I as an Autistic Advocate had no idea that my intention was to throw you in a mental institution.
"That is currently the most hotly debated issue regarding autism."
That is if you call your rambling and close-minded ranting "debate."
Are you ignoring my sarcasm or are you too stupid to notice it?
"I have just exposed neurodiversity for the sham it is, and you refuse to acknowledge that."
Are you sure you're not mistaking yourself for Jason Segel and "neurdiversity" for his cock?? Because "neurodiversity" has been exposed less than the bitch I broke up with two months ago who wouldn't put out.
I can't stand Catholic girls, it gets annoying with Jesus cockblocking me.
"Andrew, please do not bring my sexual orientation into this."
Wow, you seem pretty jumpy on defending your sexual orientation, when I wasn't accusing you of being anything other than straight.
"I exposed neurodiversity as a bunch of pedophiles who recruit autistic children just to sexually molest them. and I will become rich and famous as a result, just like Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You won't become as famous as Jiminy Glick!!!
"Andrew, you accused me of wanting to suck on Jason Segel's dick, so I told you the truth which is that I'm strait and don't want to suck dick."
At what point??
And also for someone who is such a little shit regarding talking shit about spelling and typos. Why don't you spell straight the right way? Because I don't think you are trying to say that your sexual orientation is a narrow channel. Mine sure isn't narrow.
"I will, however, become rich and famous as a result of this expose. First the New Republic will pick up on my story. Then I will copyright and charge people a million dollars in royalties to republish it. I will then sell movie rights for 2 million dollars, followed by book rights for 3 million. I will be singlehandedly known as the man who brought down neurodiversity, and I will be revered as a national hero for all mankind."
I'll ask you again do you even proofread the dumb shit you post?
You'll be about as famous as Rainbow fucking Randolph!!!
Canby you are sick homophobe, who is insecure about his own sexuality.
What are you hiding?
Oliver the reason you can't get a shag has nothing to do with autism. Believe me.
Neurodiversity 2.0 of which I am the Overlord and Ultimate Arbiter has a place even for people like you - although I will decline from sending you as our representative to the United States of Queers Convention.
Andrew, I'm not sure Neurodiversity 1.0 wants Dubin to be strung-up at all. I think they wish we would all just forget about it. They have a lot of things they would like people to forget about.
If you haven't noticed, Michelle Dawson and me (and one or two others) smashed ND 1.0 into little pieces.
It's time generally for people to learn the lesson, regroup and continue with our work. But continue after having laid the foundations of a representative and inclusive organisation.
I seriously think you should start describing yourself as the former-friend. Seriously, if you want to have any chance of any kind of successful public life.
Oliver, there clearly is a brain in there, we just need to wash it.
I was talking to Andrew about the friend thing.
Has Kent Adams changed? He's always been the same as far as I can remember - we were both on the Autism Hub, and we both had a more realistic and grown-up idea about Neurodiversity.
Neurodiversity for me is about respecting every human being as having an innate and equal worth as any other.
Ari Ne'eman, Nick Dubin and most of the super-shinies are [maybe] autistic to some extent, but not to one that needs curing.
Someone like me? Well, either I need $100,000 a year welfare to have a decent life, or something else.
Some aspects of my autism (the anxiety and ED issues I badly need help with) others it's not my autism that causes the trouble but peoples reaction to it.
They certainly need a cure for their fuckery.
This is no good over the internet. I should be coming round and dragging you off to the Burning Man. I'd get you laid.
Michelle Dawson, Kent Adams and me all believe in Neurodiversity. That's why we keep twatting stupid people that are fucking it up and making a laughing-stock of us in Middle America and anywhere else they're not stoned out of their brains.
And yes, I am drunk. It helps. A bit.
lol! ED=Executive dysfunction!
Back to reply in the morning - it's 1am...
"I seriously think you should start describing yourself as the former-friend."
Well, obviously I value my friends more than you, Socrates. I support everybody disavowing him if he is guilty, but me I don't abandon my friends.
"Seriously, if you want to have any chance of any kind of successful public life."
I enjoy having a successful public life, but not at the expense of selling out who I am. Who I am is a true and loyal friend, and if the public doesn't like it, then as always, I don't mind receiving fellatio. If they have a problem with loyalty amongst friends in something that is personal and not anything professional then they can bite my fleshy, "mercury poisoned" ass.
"That was a false accusation from me to you."
So you're admitting that you're a lying prick?
"I prefer to spell my sexual orientation "strait" as opposed to "straight," because I feel it better represents me. I feel more like the Strait of Magellan or the Strait of Juan de Fuca or the Bering Strait. "
Such a queer thing to do, alter spelling to represent your identity as an individual. I'm not accusing you of being gay, or homosexual, just saying "how queer."
"And yes, I am strait and narrow"
Don't tell the ladies you're narrow, because nobody wants to know beforehand that the person talking to them has a narrow dick.
"I don't need to proofread my work, because it is all true."
"ANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK!!! I'm sorry Hans, would you like to go for Double Jeopardy, where the scores can REALLY CHANGE?!" - John McClane.
"I don't know who Rainbow fucking Randolph is."
Do you not have google??
"I think he actually believes in all this lunacy."
HAHAHAHA Just because I'm laughing hyserically at you does not mean I'm a loon, considering that it is your bat-shit insanity that is inspiring my hysterical laughter.
"but defending this pedophile isn't gonna help you."
I didn't say anything about defending him, if he is guilty, I said remaining friends with him if he is guilty, as in still hanging out, talking about shit and playing tennis.
"Your friend is guilty."
Considering the fact that you're such a "constitutionalist" and a supporter of the ballsack in mouth movement, you pretty much aren't allowing him to be innocent until proven guilty.
"It's best you just ditch neurodiversity altogehter and become pro-cure."
Meh, I've heard you say funnier things.
"Same thing with "separation between church and state." Just ask Christine O'Donnell."
Well, I guess you're an ignorant bimbo too then who hasn't heard of the first amendment.
"Your friend has admitted to being a pedophile, so don't give me that bullshit."
He admitted to possessing child pornography and to the illegality of possessing it, there is still speculation regarding his motive. A lot of people (granted it is speculation, but so is anything you say regarding motive) speculate that he was doing it so he could gain a greater understanding of bullying, which is something he has a great deal of interest in getting to the root of. I don't know for sure, he won't answer his phone.
"Andrew, if I knew anyone who was a convicted pedophile, I would publicly disavow any ties with them, including being friends with them."
That's because you're not a man's man. Bros are bros, and the way I see it the only thing that can erase a man's friendship is being disloyal, so you may be a chicken shit worried about your repuation, but far as I'm concerned I have enough friends and the capability to get poon when I want it, either way, so I could give a rat's ass what people think of me being true-blue.
And again he is not a convicted pedophile... he's not even an alleged pedophile, pedophelia is having sex or sexual behavior with minors.
"Downloading child porn off the Internet is illegal, regardless of the motives."
I'm not disputing that, but if his motives were, indeed noble, than it is less of a heinous act, and with less of a heinous act, a sentence that isn't harsh is called for. It is still a crime and should be punished, but the degree is the only thing anybody Autistic Advocate or Curaqi is really debating.
"He won't answer his phone because he is prohibited from speaking to minors while he awaits trial."
I'm not a minor.
"Actually, Andrew, the First Amendment says nothing about a separation between chruch and state."
...
...
...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
Read it and weep. Quote the Constition, "Nevermore."
It says right there that there shall be no religious establishment within the government (state.) If the Constitution dictates no religious establishment, then that means there is a separation of Church And State.
What's the matter they didn't teach you reading skill at VGW?
Oh and I have not been powned because the word you are looking for, in your attempt to appear to be a "normal heterosexual male" is pwn. If you really had any idea what you are talking about, you'd know how to spell pwn, and know where it originates from. But since you don't know jack shit about video games like a panzy, you don't know what you are talking about, just like every other sound produced by your larynx.
Socrates: I tried to comment on your blog, there is some reason i can't. I heard you got banned from Michelle Dawson's TMOB comment board, congrats, quite an achievement.
It saddens me that your autism has driven you to alcoholism and you always write posts in a drunken stupor, so you would tell Oliver that his celibacy is not autism related.
We can judge Andrew Ackner by the company he keeps. If he truly believes that Dubin was downloading child porn regularly for a two year period for noble reasons, well I have a bridge for sale in the city of Brooklyn I would like to sell him.
"We can judge Andrew Ackner by the company he keeps."
Anybody can be judged by the company he keeps Jonboy. You act like your best friend, your own hand is a good innocent fellow.
"If he truly believes that Dubin was downloading child porn regularly for a two year period for noble reasons,"
Like, I said the evidence against him is pretty damning, and it is likely that he, in a despicable manner fucked everthing up and has definitely put everything that he and many of us worked to establish in diar jeopardy. I am not saying that he's not 100% guilty with dirty motives, the evidence I'm looking at points against him. But my evidence set is different from yours, because he and I have been friends for the last five years and this is something I could never in a million years think of him doing. And you also have to take into account that I was 14 years old when we became friends and he never made passes at me. So while it seems more likely to me that he is guilty, because the evidence looks that way there is a slight chance that we all are wrong. I think it is more likely that you are right, I'm just putting it out that it is a possibility that he did it for a deeper understanding of bullying. And if he is guilty, I will have lost a great deal of respect for him as a man, and because of all the detriment his fall will cause the movement for ASD. I will not disown him, but I will not have the same respect I had when just a week ago I looked up to him like an older brother.
"I am not a lying prick, I just made a false accusation about you."
That makes you a lying prick... DUMBASS!!! A credible source of anything, which you are claiming to be doesn't make false accusations... EVER. And when they do they definitely don't admit it like there's nothing wrong with it. Again you're going to be as famous a source of knowledge as Jiminy Glick... look it up!!!
""Also, you are doing what all those judicial activists do and freely interpreting the Constitution to say whatever you want it to say."
And your fucking point is?? The Constitution is designed to serve the people, not fuckheads corrupt by their own biases who try to interpret it litarally because that is what serves you fucks.
"It is meant to be taken literally, and the point I was trying to make is that those exact words are found nowhere in the Constitution."
Good, Canby then under those rules if I were to say the following then I guess I'm not calling you a cock-sucking gay faggot, because I am not saying those words... Oliver canby is a goddamn homoe. Didn't say the words cock-sucking gay faggot, therefore you have no defamation case, biatch!!!
"Andrew Ackner is gullible and naive. I'm not so sure though."
I'm not the one who thinks that there's a magic bottle that guarantees that you will be laid within a week, and is stupid enough to actually purchase such a scam if there was.
"You did defame me, because you called me homosexual, and I hate gay people."
Ah ah ah. You're the one who says meaning should only be read literally by exact wording and "homo" is not the same thing as homosexual under Canby's Rules Of Meaning Of Words. And besides I didn't call you a homo, I called you a "homoe" which under your rules is not the same word. .. it's not a word at all. Therefore, I haven't defamed shit, you whiny little heaumo.
"Therefore, I have a legitimate case against you."
Not after a Judge reads any of this nonsense. First, he'll laugh himself silly, and then he might decide to take your computers away. Thanks for the yucks!
"Andrew, it matters not what you say, but what you mean."
In that case then you don't have a defamation case against me because what I meant wasn't calling you gay. While I did say variations on the spelling of a word that means gay, what I meant by it was to show to anybody reading this what an ignorant jackass you are.
Fine, sue me, I'll represent myself. But you're gonna end up having to pay for my airfare, even though it'll worth paying to laugh at your face.
The reason the Judge might take your computer away is because he'd be doing you a service, by making you face the real world.
You don't really know yet what your sexual identification is. If you were tossed in jail for any reason, someone would soon "make you his bitch", and make you like it. Then you'd be "turned".
You'd better hurry up and get that ALA, or EDTA shot, and see if they work!
I didn't call you gay, I was using quality rhetoric to prove what a narrowminded twit you are. And had I actually been calling you gay, then you deserve it.
"Under the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, a judge cannot take one's computer away without reasonable cause."
Ah but those words are not in the 4th amendment and under your rules the Constitution is supposed to only be interpreted by verbatum. Therefore the judge could take your computer away.
"This essentially proves what we knew all along about neurodiversity; that they are a bunch of pedophiles who recruit autistic children for the purpose of sexual abuse."
So, by your own logic:
"The KKK are a Christian group who support slavery. Those who kill abortion doctors are devout Christians. Ted Haggard was a popular Christian televangelist preacher who indulged in a homosexual affair. The Catholic Church is going through a pedophile priest scandal.
Therefore all Christians are racist, homosexual murderers who rape children. Simple, really." (Thanks, S!)
So, by your own admission, this must relate to you.
Look, this whole debate means nothing to me personally. I was sent here by a series of unfortunate events and bizarre links, and what I find is some one who appears to me to be on the verge of a complete breakdown. You need some serious help.
While I understand the desire of some for a cure for autism, it cannot happen no more than a cure for blue eyes can happen because of the genetic nature of the impairment. However, I will not blast you for wanting a cure.
I will also not put you down for putting down some one who downloaded images of child porn. One of my musical heroes - Pete Townshend - was also caught out. While his motives were in fact psychological - he was trying to come to terms with his own abuse - it does not make the crime any less heinous.
What I will look at, however, is your tarring of all people with a same brush. And I know that even though you have done this, the fact you can be tarred with the Christian brush mentioned above (written, I should add, by a friend of mine) should tell you how dangerous it is to do such a thing.
Fight for what you believe by all means, but to do something like this is going to harm any argument you put forth. Nothing you say will be taken seriously by anyone with a modicum of intelligence if they look at all-encompassing statements you make and insist are the truth.
Of course, I fully expect you to not allow this through and if you do to deny everything written here. But, again, it is to your detriment to at least not take on board the over-arching criticism of your piece - that you cannot pigeon hole people.
Yours fully expecting to be abused,
Geoffrey
"This essentially proves what we knew all along about neurodiversity; that they are a bunch of pedophiles who recruit autistic children for the purpose of sexual abuse."
So, by your own logic:
"The KKK are a Christian group who support slavery. Those who kill abortion doctors are devout Christians. Ted Haggard was a popular Christian televangelist preacher who indulged in a homosexual affair. The Catholic Church is going through a pedophile priest scandal.
Therefore all Christians are racist, homosexual murderers who rape children. Simple, really." (Thanks, S!)
So, by your own admission, this must relate to you.
Look, this whole debate means nothing to me personally. I was sent here by a series of unfortunate events and bizarre links, and what I find is some one who appears to me to be on the verge of a complete breakdown. You need some serious help.
While I understand the desire of some for a cure for autism, it cannot happen no more than a cure for blue eyes can happen because of the genetic nature of the impairment. However, I will not blast you for wanting a cure.
I will also not put you down for putting down some one who downloaded images of child porn. One of my musical heroes - Pete Townshend - was also caught out. While his motives were in fact psychological - he was trying to come to terms with his own abuse - it does not make the crime any less heinous.
What I will look at, however, is your tarring of all people with a same brush. And I know that even though you have done this, the fact you can be tarred with the Christian brush mentioned above (written, I should add, by a friend of mine) should tell you how dangerous it is to do such a thing.
Fight for what you believe by all means, but to do something like this is going to harm any argument you put forth. Nothing you say will be taken seriously by anyone with a modicum of intelligence if they look at all-encompassing statements you make and insist are the truth.
Of course, I fully expect you to not allow this through and if you do to deny everything written here. But, again, it is to your detriment to at least not take on board the over-arching criticism of your piece - that you cannot pigeon hole people.
Yours fully expecting to be abused,
Geoffrey
"This essentially proves what we knew all along about neurodiversity; that they are a bunch of pedophiles who recruit autistic children for the purpose of sexual abuse."
So, by your own logic:
"The KKK are a Christian group who support slavery. Those who kill abortion doctors are devout Christians. Ted Haggard was a popular Christian televangelist preacher who indulged in a homosexual affair. The Catholic Church is going through a pedophile priest scandal.
Therefore all Christians are racist, homosexual murderers who rape children. Simple, really." (Thanks, S!)
So, by your own admission, this must relate to you.
Look, this whole debate means nothing to me personally. I was sent here by a series of unfortunate events and bizarre links, and what I find is some one who appears to me to be on the verge of a complete breakdown. You need some serious help.
While I understand the desire of some for a cure for autism, it cannot happen no more than a cure for blue eyes can happen because of the genetic nature of the impairment. However, I will not blast you for wanting a cure.
I will also not put you down for putting down some one who downloaded images of child porn. One of my musical heroes - Pete Townshend - was also caught out. While his motives were in fact psychological - he was trying to come to terms with his own abuse - it does not make the crime any less heinous.
What I will look at, however, is your tarring of all people with a same brush. And I know that even though you have done this, the fact you can be tarred with the Christian brush mentioned above (written, I should add, by a friend of mine) should tell you how dangerous it is to do such a thing.
Fight for what you believe by all means, but to do something like this is going to harm any argument you put forth. Nothing you say will be taken seriously by anyone with a modicum of intelligence if they look at all-encompassing statements you make and insist are the truth.
Of course, I fully expect you to not allow this through and if you do to deny everything written here. But, again, it is to your detriment to at least not take on board the over-arching criticism of your piece - that you cannot pigeon hole people.
Yours fully expecting to be abused,
Geoffrey
Sure, if you went in there, wasting the court's time with this 7th grade kind of thing, "This guy called me a faggot, and is hiding behind semantics", and he read the transcript of you guys' posts, he might get angry enough to impose some sanctions that would solve your problem.
Hi Geoff, You seem like a cool dude. Teh Intawebs do take ya to some strange backwaters...
Oliver, "Homosexual Faggot" is tautologous.
In all the reading I did about Dubin, the fact that he seems to be queer didn't really register to a significant degree compared to the paedo bit of the affair.
Knowing if someone is Gay or not is often interesting gossip; perhaps akin to knowing someone voted for the Tea Party (Oh no! that is a slight on faggots - sorry no offence intended). Umm, the same as knowing they don't wear knickers on a Friday, but little more than gossip.
You've got to admit there's been some pretty cool queers. How about this guy?
Oliver, you'd get dx'ed from that last comment alone. A lot of what I write should [irony]totally ignored[/irony].
I find neurodiversity to be a corrupt organization with bad morals, so I will do whatever I can to derail them.
You'd make a fine tabloid journalist. If you weren't so screamingly right-wing and homophobic I'd ask you to write for the New Republic.
Socrates - apparently, you owe Ollie a lot of money! Didn't you see what he wrote up there?
"First the New Republic will pick up on my story. Then I will copyright and charge people a million dollars in royalties to republish it. I will then sell movie rights for 2 million dollars, followed by book rights for 3 million. I will be singlehandedly known as the man who brought down neurodiversity, and I will be revered as a national hero for all mankind."
He seems to be under the impression that he broke this story, and that 'his story' is worth a wank. ;-)
" Nobody previously had reported that neurodiversity is a bunch of pedophiles who sexually molest children. "
...
Hmmm...
...
I wonder why nobody else reported that story...
...
Hmmm...
Why on Earth could that be?
...
Probably, because nobody is as big of a stupid fuckhead as you.
No, I think recently there were two incidents that separately that sparked concern, and then another ND'er turning up around the corner from the paedobear did cause me to look askance and wonder if there was a systematic problem.
I fell slightly reassured given some replies from some of the people. But I won't apologise for raising the issues.
Being abused and then having photographs of this abuse masturbated over for years by strangers, fucks kids up for life.
It's such bad news that sending someone down for 5 to 20 to let everyone know how unacceptable it is, is probably justified. It might help the kids feel better about things?
I am Neurodiversity - I am not liberal, nor left-wing, nor politically correct.
There has been a changing of the guard. The cult has been smashed. The neurotypicals exiled...
"so I usually report things that others don't see."
No you just have an uncanny ability to see things that aren't there (without the help of acid.) You know what that's called Oliver? Schizophrenia. Google that, while your googling Rainbow Randolph, and Jiminy Glick
You have google... fucking use it you dumb twerp.
Post a Comment