Saturday, October 30, 2010
The Informer Calls Me A Faggot
Well, this is all getting really out of hand. The Informer has decided to call me a faggot simply because I took exception to him banning me from his blog, which was well deserved on his part. He has no evidence at all to believe that I am gay, as I have stated numerous times that I am strait, and that is the God's honest truth. There's an old saying that people who call other people gay do it to cover up their own homosexuality, and I'm starting to think that's the case with The Informer. He tried to suck on Phil's dick but got turned away because Phil is strait and has been married for 18 years. Now he's lusting after me, and he thinks he can take advantage of me and try to turn me into a homosexual by using my young age and naivete against me. That isn't gonna work, Informless! I've been strait since I was 10 years old, and I plan to keep it that way. You are a sick pervert lusting after young men online! No wonder you got offended by my pedophiles statement. You are one for fuck's sake! He mentions Joeker in the post immediately after the one where he (falsely) rips my sexual orientation. Joeker, if you're reading this, watch out. You will most likely be The Informer's next victim, so I'd disavow all ties with him if I were you. I unfortunately can't sue him for defamation, because he hides his real name good and Australian privacy laws are apparently stricter than those of the USA, so it's unlikely I'll find his real name in the phonebook. Man, that's 3 exposes I've made in the past week alone. God only knows what'll be next!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
31 comments:
"There's an old saying that people who call other people gay do it to cover up their own homosexuality, and I'm starting to think that's the case with The Informer."
Ummmm... you called him gay first... FAGGOT!!!
"I've been strait since I was 10 years old,"
... So am I supposed to assume you were something else before you were ten years old?
Puhlease... you dream of sex with Nick Lache just like every other homo.
Who the fuck is Trevor? One of your buttbuddies?
Again, I'm not the one who has a problem, you're the one who has a problem, which is why I am using your problem to piss you off. Sound strategy eh?
Implying homosexuality equals calling it, Canby. Andrew was right, you called DisInformer gay first. If anyone needs that Trevor person's help right now, it's you. You're confused, and that's why you can't get a girl.
Enough said.
Oh and in case you missed it, DisInformer is laughing at you. He baited you and you fell for it.
"I am not gay, and that's the way the cookie crumbles."
Is this the cookie you baked yourself and then crumbled together with the boys.
I've read it, and it is very eye-opening... it damn sure opened your brown eye.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
You're making a fucking idiot of yourself, Oliver! I'm not looking for a partner! You are! You did fall for my trap and you did call me gay first. Anyway, you're gay. And you are useless in the fight against Glucose and his mates which is why I threw you off my blog to begin with.
Right, so we have to fight Glucose alone. Is that it? Is he your friend now?
The world's better off without YOU, fuck wit. Unless you get your own head out of your arse and get with the fucking program.
You did call me gay. Without proof. I do have proof that you are gay and I bolded it on my blog. Your own words.
"Anyway, what did you think about the twist ending? I couldn't believe Reverend Sperbeck was a faggot!"
I didn't really care that much about it. It may have been interesting and surprising, as well as horrifying to some readers like yourself, but me, I'm not someone who gives a shit where people like to put their cocks. My theory on all people, whether it be a priest or an 18 year old dipshit who wants Jason Segel's dick is that if anybody's opinion on homosexuality is anything stronger than "who gives a shit" then that person is gay.
"You ripped my quote about Jason Segel way out of context and you know it."
Something about his cock must've been interesting to you, because that part wasn't out of context. Or when you saw that scene did you misread what it was you were looking at like Edward Norton's charact in this scene in the great movie known as Death To Smoochy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvMefyDa7Yg
Just to spare the suspense and sorry to disappoint you about Death To Smoochy. But Edward Norton doesn't flash his dick.
But I'm having so much fun, not as much fun as you have with cocks in your mouth, but I'm having a lot of fun nonetheless.
"and it needs to stop."
That's not what you told your boyfriend last night.
I've had this.
Canby, you are homosexual. No doubt about it because of your constant denials and your refusal to properly address the root problem. Go to Nevada and prove to us that you are straight (spell it right, and that's not a US v UK spelling situation BTW). You have no excuse not to. PROVE IT PROPERLY! Or tell us the correct reason why you enjoyed seeing Jason Segel's penis in that movie.
Until you do all that - I don't believe you. Neither does Andrew. Your word is not enough anymore.
"and there's no going back from here."
Well no shit Oliver, your boyfriend's cock is as far back up your ass as it can reach.
Walter's not my middle name, dickhead. That's a name I gave myself on Facebook because I hate my real middle name, and I decided that I like the middle name Walter after Walter Sobchak from the Big Lebowski.
Trust me, I'm a comedian, and a skilled liar, I don't use the great skill I have in lying often because I find it immoral, but the fact is I'm great at it. The reason I mention it is, just like the best writer is the one who is the best reader, the best lie detector is the one who is the best liar. And you when it comes to lying, as, the person whose name I assume in my middle name would say "you're a fucking amateur." I know you're lying and that you are gay, I've seen a lotta straight men in my day, Dude. "And this one's a fake, a fucking goldbricker. I've never been more certain of anything in my entire life." Hell, I'm more certain than Walter was about The Big Lebowski not really being a paraplegic, and unlike him I'm right.
I don't legally change it because I am a lazy Jewish pothead, who doesn't feel the need to legally change my name because I go by Andrew Ackner either way.
And the fact is you are gay. You're gayer than Sacha Baron Cohen's character Bruno.
"Simon Baron Cohen, is an expert on autism, although he leans neurodiverse in his views."
That a common trait among sane, rational members of academia.
You know what, fine I'm going to give you a chance to prove me wrong. I want you tell me in your own words what type of girl you find physically attractive. No linking images. You also can't use comparisons to famous females that I would know of. You're a straight man apparently, so you should be able to pass my test, shouldn't you?
I see your lies, not just because you went for the most obvious answers, that any closet homo would say, but because you weren't descriptive enough. Most straight guys have a hair-color preference and a facial structure preference, and also we tend to have a specific idea of what is a hot skin-tone, but since you don't, you obviously are not heterosexual.
"(I mean, who doesn't like blondes,"
I don't, I'm more of a brunette guy.
"and I already mentioned skin tone when I mentioned race (skin tone and race are synonymous, which you were too stupid to realize because you were determined to call me gay no matter what the circumstances were)."
No, skin tone is different because there are different levels of skin tone in each ethnicity, I'm white and have an olive skin tone, my friend Ben Duchan is white and has even darker olive skin tone and my friend Josh Sherman is white and is pale as a Klan Member's costume.
"I'm not the one who's gonna get laughed at when I fuck a girl, and then be demanded a handwritten letter of apology, or a defamation lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court."
You wouldn't win shit in court dickhead. This is your blog that this is being published on, going through comment moderation that you yourself conduct. You are the one who is allowing these defamatory comments to posted and available to be seen all over the world. Go fuck yourself canby you closet heaumo.
Heaumo.
"I've seen your YouTube videos that attack and vilify autistic people."
Really? They totally attack and vilify Autistic people by saying that we are equal to everybody else, and have a right to being treated fairly, and that equal treatment and fair treatment aren't always the same. I say that we are entitled to being accepted in society while doing our best to be as fit for it as reasonably possible.
I'm totally the one attacking and vilifying autistic people... says the dipshit who (paraphrasing with practically the exact same words) said that we are inferior to "normal" people and must accept them as "superiors" and "masters" And that to do we must realize that we need to cure ourselves to "relieve them of the burden we cause them."
While I'm on the topic of how you think we are inferior to "normal" people and that they are our "masters" I'm sure you'd like to picture it that way, a strong, buff "normal slave-driver" given you spankings on the butt with his leather crop. That's why you vilify yourself and everyone else on the Spectrum isn't it, you heaumo??
"Andrew, now you are acting like a politician. You left out one major part of your autistic views: that autistic people should be denied a cure, even if they should desire one. That is denying autistic people their most basic human right: to be normal. You seek to deny them that right, solely for your own political gain."
Ummm... actually that's the opposite of what would be good for political gain. If I said everything else that I say and then said "but people who want a cure should be allowed to get if it is discovered," then I would have the support of everyone I currently have and would also have the support of assholes like you, Bitchell, and Worst.
"You deny the very existence of low-functioning autistics, and claim to speak on their behalf."
Hey fuckhead, READ MY TEXT JACKASS!!! Low-functioning autistics exist. I am affirming, not denying their existence right here in this sentence!!! I do not claim to speak on their behalf, I am saying that nobody can speak on their behalf when there is nothing to determine what they want or how they feel. And I believe the right thing to do is to not undergo such a serious procedure without knowing if the patient wants it or not. You can say "who would want to have such an affliction" but that doesn't make it so that they want to be cured, when the eon arrives that a cure is discovered.
"The truth is that you want low-functioning autistics thrown in mental institutions to help the pharmaceutical industry."
Fuck the pharmaceutical industry I owe no allegiance to them and follow orders from only two entities, my brains, and my balls. And the truth is I do not want low-functioning autistic thrown in mental institutions I want them to be taught as many skills as humanly possible that allow them to live the highest quality of life as possible. I'm not a politician because I don't lie, so I will speak the truth regarding people on the spectrum and mental institutions, and openly admit it there is one person on the autism spectrum I would like to see thrown in a mental institution, you may actually know him Oliver Canby, his name is Oliver Canby.
By the way Oliver, you should join the facebook page I started.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Give-Glenn-Beck-The-Oscar-He-Deserves/158752080828554?v=info
"Andrew, now you are acting like a politician. You left out one major part of your autistic views: that autistic people should be denied a cure, even if they should desire one. That is denying autistic people their most basic human right: to be normal. You seek to deny them that right, solely for your own political gain."
Ummm... actually that's the opposite of what would be good for political gain. If I said everything else that I say and then said "but people who want a cure should be allowed to get if it is discovered," then I would have the support of everyone I currently have and would also have the support of assholes like you, Bitchell, and Worst.
"You deny the very existence of low-functioning autistics, and claim to speak on their behalf."
Hey fuckhead, READ MY TEXT JACKASS!!! Low-functioning autistics exist. I am affirming, not denying their existence right here in this sentence!!! I do not claim to speak on their behalf, I am saying that nobody can speak on their behalf when there is nothing to determine what they want or how they feel. And I believe the right thing to do is to not undergo such a serious procedure without knowing if the patient wants it or not. You can say "who would want to have such an affliction" but that doesn't make it so that they want to be cured, when the eon arrives that a cure is discovered.
"The truth is that you want low-functioning autistics thrown in mental institutions to help the pharmaceutical industry."
Fuck the pharmaceutical industry I owe no allegiance to them and follow orders from only two entities, my brains, and my balls. And the truth is I do not want low-functioning autistic thrown in mental institutions I want them to be taught as many skills as humanly possible that allow them to live the highest quality of life as possible. I'm not a politician because I don't lie, so I will speak the truth regarding people on the spectrum and mental institutions, and openly admit it there is one person on the autism spectrum I would like to see thrown in a mental institution, you may actually know him Oliver Canby, his name is Oliver Canby.
By the way Oliver, you should join the facebook page I started.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Give-Glenn-Beck-The-Oscar-He-Deserves/158752080828554?v=info
The whole context of the scene is funny
That's better! Why didn't you say that when you were first asked the question? If you had you would have avoided this whole thing. The fact that you didn't is the core reason why I said what I said, and unlike your accusation against me - it would have held up in court.
But now that you have explained it as I demanded, I withdraw the accusation.
I would point out though, that calling me on not taking you at your word (in effect) is no different to you not accepting my word on all aspects of the Autistic Spectrum and it's effects. Just remember that in future before attacking me should I ever want to make a point or more importantly a correction to anything you say. Note also that there is NOT overwhelmed evidence as to your sexuality either way - certainly not any that a court would accept.
..that autistic people should be denied a cure, even if they should desire one. That is denying autistic people their most basic human right: to be normal.
There is no such right, because there is no such thing as normal. The most basic human right is to be allowed to be yourself (as long as you aren't breaking the law in doing so). You are Autistic and you have the right to be Autistic. To deny yourself that right (and it's not a choice, remember) is to deny yourself a decent life. And you can get one. All you have to do is chase it - as is your right to freedom and liberty. Right? You are denying yourself the opportunity to get laid. It has nothing to do with your Autism and it never will. It never was Mitchell's fault. In the case of both of you, you are consumed with hatred for the condition and that is what held Mitchell back. If you don't overcome it now, you'll never get laid. You will never find a cure, because it doesn't exist.
That's my last post on this thread - and Andrew, on behalf of the Phil's World membership (specifically Tex and Twinkles) stop with the gay stuff. I only said it to make him see some sense, and it worked because he gave out information that explained a lot. If I see another post here continuing the line, you'll cop a week's suspension from Phil's World. Okay? There are other ways to criticise Canby, and this one has run it's course.
(1 of 2) "Andrew, now you are acting like a politician. You left out one major part of your autistic views: that autistic people should be denied a cure, even if they should desire one. That is denying autistic people their most basic human right: to be normal. You seek to deny them that right, solely for your own political gain."
Ummm... actually that's the opposite of what would be good for political gain. If I said everything else that I say and then said "but people who want a cure should be allowed to get if it is discovered," then I would have the support of everyone I currently have and would also have the support of assholes like you, Bitchell, and Worst.
"You deny the very existence of low-functioning autistics, and claim to speak on their behalf."
Hey fuckhead, READ MY TYPED WORDS JACKASS!!! Low-functioning autistics exist. I am affirming, not denying their existence right here in this sentence!!! I do not claim to speak on their behalf, I am saying that nobody can speak on their behalf when there is nothing to determine what they want or how they feel. And I believe the right thing to do is to not undergo such a serious procedure without knowing if the patient wants it or not. You can say "who would want to have such an affliction" but that doesn't make it so that they want to be cured, when the eon arrives that a cure is discovered.
(2 of 2) "The truth is that you want low-functioning autistics thrown in mental institutions to help the pharmaceutical industry."
Fuck the pharmaceutical industry I owe no allegiance to them and follow orders from only two entities, my brains, and my balls. And the truth is I do not want low-functioning autistic thrown in mental institutions I want them to be taught as many skills as humanly possible that allow them to live the highest quality of life as possible. I'm not a politician because I don't lie, so I will speak the truth regarding people on the spectrum and mental institutions, and openly admit that there is one person on the autism spectrum I would like to see thrown in a mental institution, you may actually know him Oliver Canby, because his name happens to be Oliver Canby.
By the way Oliver, you should join the facebook page I started earlier tonight.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Give-Glenn-Beck-The-Oscar-He-Deserves/158752080828554?v=info
"The issues that low-functioning autistics face and the issues that Aspergians face can sometimes be very different, so keep in mind that other autistic people may have issues far more severe than yours and mine."
Has it ever occurred to you that Low-functioning Autistics don't want what you, I or any other Aspie wants? Because there is evidence just by looking at the key differences between Aspies and High-Functioning Autistic that could very well be the case. Aspies like you and me have the desire to fit in with everybody else, there is no denying it, we want to be noticed and in a socially-accepted manner, HFAs don't have that same drive and are more content as is. I've said many times that I wasn't content with the person I used to be because I didn't fit in, so I worked hard and integrated my aspieness with appropriate behavior. But the reason I mention this is that since HFAs are generally content with who they are, it is more likely than not that LFAs are content with who they are and don't want to be changed. They're happy, just leave them be. LFA causes more problems for the parents than the child who actually has it, if you really think about it, I'm not denying that LFAs have it hard, they obviously do, and I'm not knocking down their parents, I am just making an observation, that the parents have a way harder time coping than the LFA him/herself.
And you also have to take into account after a certain age, language acquisition becomes impossible, so LFAs after that age, if cured when a cure is discovered still would not be able to communicate normally. The same thing with all over developmental processes the patients would have missed. The only thing that it would do is prevent any sensory difficulties and anything else that isn't a developmental issue.
You, for example would not acquire social skills, because the acquisition of social skills is a developmental process, that's why many (not all, a good friend of mine was and has great social skills) home-schooled-kids have no social skills, they're not Aspies, they just never were given the environment to learn social skills. You never learned social skills because you were afraid to go out there and do it what it takes to acquire them. Anybody can hit a tennis ball over a net, that's easy. But to actually hit a good shot over and over, you have to learn how to do it through trial and so many errors, and the same it is with interacting with other people. The only thing a cure would do for you is decrease any sensory problems you may have, possibly change the way you view the world, and it may give your more confidence to actually learn the social skills... oh and it may also relieve of that high IQ you have too.
Post a Comment