Friday, August 6, 2010
Autistic And Intellectually Disabled
Things like going to college, getting a job, driving a car, and having sex are taken for granted by most people. However, I can do none of those, as I am autistic and intellectually disabled. I did manage to graduate high school, albeit after 4 1/2 years because I was too intellectually disabled to graduate at 17, and I ended up leaving a normal school midway through the year because I couldn't handle it intelectually. I applied to work at In-N-Out, however I was rejected due to my intellectual disability. I cannot take care of myself, and shouldn't be left alone. I had long rejected having "special needs," but now it seems that is inevitable and I must relegate myself to a lower rung. I understand what neurodiversity would say, however I cannot suffice without a cure. Thankfully, that cure is chelation. I learned about it from John Best last year, and while I have yet to test it on myself, I know what miracles it can work. Don't get me wrong: I'd like to succeed without a cure, but that ain't gonna happen. Going to a normal school last year really gave me a wakeup call, and made me realize that I am indeed inferior to the rest of the world. Before that, I thought I could do anything despite being autistic. How wrong I was. When it came to the point that I couldn't even speak in normal school, I had to withdraw midway through the year. It was a mistake to have gone in the first place. Although I do have a high school diploma, it is hard to find a job with just that, and I cannot attend college due to my intellectual disability. Therefore, a cure is the only option. I hope to commence curing myself next month, and I still hold a glimmer of hope that I will succeed in spite of my autism, but that is seeming less and less realistic as time goes by. Sometimes I wonder why I entered this world, as there is so much hatemongering here I don't know if I can take it. Anyway, my days are probably numbered, but we'll see how comment moderation works first. I didn't want to put it back on, but I was being constantly ridiculed so I had no choice. For those whom say I have come a long way, they are wrong. I have regressed so much over the past year, it's not even funny. My self-esteem has gone way down, as has my self-worth. While a cure would fix that, I am resistant to drugs because of Big Pharma. Thankfully, a cure wouldn't have that connotation, but its mere association with drugs would turn me off of it. I am trying to succeed, but it is impossible, and I don't need neurodiversity telling me it is because they're wrong. They have never been in my shoes and thus don't know what it's like to be me. They can say they're "autistic," but that really doesn't mean shit in this circumstance as people are very different, even autistic people. Anyway, while I may succeed, my prospects are dim. Please pray for my recovery, as well as my cure of autism. Also, if you have the chance, please oppose neurodiversity as well, as they aren't what they seem. God has a plan for me, and right now that plan seems to ride me into the ground. I'm here to change that. There are so many more things I can't do. I can't go to raves, and can barely even go to concerts. I can't do drugs, and I can't drink beer. I can go to baseball games, but only in a superficial sense. Aside from occassionally taking the bus, I never leave my house. That is the life of an autistic person. Don't make it be yours.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
38 comments:
i never had a job until age 24. I worked sporadically until age 51 after it became too hard.
You could try going to community college. Though I have a 4 year degree (just barely), i went to community college for half of my college education.
I doubt chelation will cure you, so you may have to live with some limitations unfortunately.
Don't pay any attention to neurodiversity. No one should take them seriously. Even if the U.S. Government and autism speaks aren't as smart as we are.
Actually that may be proof you are not intellectually disabled. You have rejected neurodiversity. That makes you smarter than the persons in the Obama administration and the people who run the show at autism speaks.
I had a crazy messed up time in high school. I still kindled some unrealistic expectations of myself, partly due to the influence of other teens I interacted with on some awful level and my parents. Yet I was still coming to strongly be confronted by how intense my impairments were and how unprepared I was for society as I turned out to be such a screw up in a high school environment.
I had a lot of random grades and made through some of the standardized requirements to graduate and get into college by the skin of my teeth. I did about the same in the tier 3 college I went to. Although I should have handled and planned my college experience better, I doubt I could have ended up much better.
With that waste of an education, all I had were a couple of brief temp jobs thereafter that I screwed up at despite them being relatively simple jobs. I can't get any menial jobs really. And there isn't much fun I can do with my spare time, while others get to do so easily.
I've wondered what kind of biomedical problems I may have and how they even are measured. I'm not sure what to think about all of it. I wonder how the amount of heavy metals removed from the body can be measured when on chelation.
As to succeeding despite having impairments with autism, I think an idea could be to just try and get whatever one can get, and push for a better future which would be achieved by cure. I'm glad that there are increasing numbers of individuals involved standing up to the neurodiversity oppressors. I wish you luck in your choices, and that you gain extra clarity through them.
Lurker is a con artist and a liar. That's why I hate him and he hates me because I've exposed him.
And in brief - you are NOT intellectually disabled. You have Asperger's right? No one on that end of the Spectrum is intellectually disabled. No one.
Yes, every curaqi is a conartist and a liar.
Lurker is the only one I have credited as a con artist for the record. Because he's the only curebie who's a blatant fake - unlike the others like Mitchell for example.
Everyone who says Autism can be cured is a liar, and a dangerous liar at that.
And I never said anything about you being mentally retarded. You're right, they aren't the same. You aren't either. You are intelligent - it's mandatory in an Asperger's DX which you have.
Yes I have evidence, Oliver. Cresp has a history of changing his story whenever it suits him. He can never keep it straight. He makes a claim, and then contradicts it - and re-contradicts it again and again.
Asperger's Syndrome does not have a lower limit of 70 in IQ. Asperger's lower limit in IQ is between 100 and 110 (depending on the individual). Anything lower than that is PDD-NOS. HFA is in that higher bracket as well. You are NOT intellectually disabled, because you have been DXed as an Aspie. The two are polar opposites and it is impossible to be both.
Now - if you want to say "socially disabled" (which I suggest may be more accurate to describe your situation) that would be another matter. But that's society's fault - not yours. Unless you do nothing to change them. Then it's your fault.
"Is changing one's story evidence that one is lying? I think not."
Of course you think not, you're a big fan of Glenn Beck.
That dumb cocksucker does nothing but contradict himself and uncontradict himself. That's why you have no problem with Lurker doing it, because you don't mind it when Beck does it. Because you are a jackass.
Asperger's requires above average IQ only, Oliver. Average to above average is from the HFA DX. No one who is intellectually disabled is average IQ. They can however be above 70 (which is the limit for mental retardation) and that's the difference.
No, it's society's fault, no Autism's. There's nothing wrong with being Autistic. What's wrong is society causing stress which leads to regressions in functioning. That's why you have to fight society to get to your level of functioning. Letting them dictate to you that Autism is 100 percent bad will end up killing you.
Is that what you want?
FIGHT!!!
Phil, I didn't change my story. I've been trying to explain and describe myself the best I can. I've not been making things up. You disagreeing with the diagnosis I received doesn't make me a con artist for disclosing it. And you can't prove I lied about anything.
Oliver, fighting against your Autism will kill you.
Cresp, I have PLENTY of proof that you changed your life story heaps of times. I don't need to provide examples. Everyone who has seen you in action (Clay Adams and ABFH just to name a couple) knows it and it's why you were banned from their blogs. I know there were others as well and for the same reason.
You are a liar and a con artist. You are making things up even now. You have never described yourself accurately - after all it keeps changing so who can tell? Your only "disability" is laziness and that's not a disability at all.
I dare you to sue me. You can get my address from Joeker or Best.
Well, you're wrong.
Oh yes - I forgot! You do have my address as well. By all means. A word of warning though. Cresp would be suing me under US law, right? Under US defamation law I am free to say what I believe without having to prove I'm right.
That's distinct from defamation law here in Australia.
Phil, your proof doesn't rest on you not being capable of handling information that isn't straightforward and that requires some actual thought. Be specific. What am I making up? My banning from blogs had nothing to do with any alleged changing of life stories. I was banned cause they were angrily scared of the truth I tried to get others to think about. I didn't tell a lot about myself early on and even as time went by, which I now regret. I told a few things here and there that were true about myself, but no lies.
If you want to accuse me of being a con artist, ask me anything about my life to attempt to prove that I am, and see if you can spot inconsistent information. If not, think of some other ridiculous slur against me. I don't badger you much about your troubled and mysterious past. I think suing you would be interesting, but I don't have money to spare to get a lawyer. And I don't want to collect any damages, since it would basically be someone else's earned money that would have to pay it, as far as I know.
Cresp, the questions you want me to ask have already been asked before - and not just by me either. You were banned because you were and are dishonest. You are a serial pest, because you lie and you seek to confuse people in order to get what you want. A shoulder to cry on that you don't deserve. You are doing this deliberately and trying to push it as "being able to think better" to people like me and the others who have banned you. That's your first mistake - because you have also said that you have trouble with reading and comprehension. That's just one example of your litany of contradictions - AKA inconsistent information. That's how I know you are a liar and a con artist. You are the one who isn't thinking, because you refuse to.
Just one correction to Oliver's info. I have won more than one case. I have won two. And a third is definitely on the way. A fourth may be on the horizon. Not only that, when I have been the defendant I have NEVER lost.
Phil, I'm not sure what questions you're referring to, but I doubt they'd really expose inconsistent facts when my answers are stated. Look at what you call me: a pest. I know what that indicates of the attitude towards me by you and the gang of creeps you want to be in. You're annoyed at having to deal with my ripping apart of your pathetic arguments, so you call me things like dishonest. I try to clarify. The duty of your side is to confuse.
A shoulder to cry on? If this wasn't you talking, I'd ask if you were kidding. You for one, deserve nobody to carry you through your troubles, not even the vermin who facilitate your dirty work. I have nobody's shoulder to cry on, and I know I don't deserve one, but I'm not trying to get anyone to console me through what I do. You don't even have a conscience.
I'm really not sure what you're getting at when you say I push something as "being able to think better". I don't know what that has to do with my having said that I lack reading comprehension. I'm trying to deal with you guys through some common sense. Clarify your accusations, because I seriously am perplexed by how you've stated them so far. I refuse to think what you think. I disagree with you because I have thoughts of my own. But you think like an ego-centric child.
He's lying, Oliver. He knows what I'm talking about and he's hiding behind a fake condition to make it look like he doesn't understand. His prose is of a high standard, and I'm nowhere near the only person to call him on that. This contradicts his so called issues with reading and comprehension.
He also claims to have trouble opening doors - and yet he can type on a computer keyboard. That's a second example.
He knows what the questions are as well.
You're right. The other win was Dave Ayling, but the default was only initial. He ended up having to face the judge anyway and that was the final victory over him. The one time I was the defendant was complex - and also a matter not for the public record due to the terms of the decision in my favour. I can't even name the plaintiff.
Best will also lose by default. That's a guarantee now - it's just a question of when and I hope it will be before the beginning of October. As for Skipsey, I can only sue him if he sues me first because that's the only way I can get his address. I can get his suit struck out, and then I will proceed against him - with a mountain of evidence against him and here in Australia as well.
Yeah Oliver, I like making Phil have to face and think of his own character flaws.
Phil, I had a thought you were referring to the kind of so called "contradictions" you mention. I don't even know what prose really means, yet you say that contradicts my problems with reading comprehension. I've known of my problems reading since I was like 8. Reading long things is typically hard for me. I can't usually keep track of the things and content contained in paragraphs and pages, and don't usually get many of the broader aspects about it. I typically do lousy on reading based things on standardized tests.
I had referred to one time when I didn't realize fast enough that there was a latch on a door that had to be pushed to open that door at some place I once exited from. I have lots of various screw ups that don't always occur frequently, but the many incidents add up to a lot.
"I can't usually keep track of the things and content contained in paragraphs and pages."
Then explain to me, Lurker, how the hell you managed to read that long-paragraph written by Phil and give such an eloquently response.
Oliver, vocabulary is a crucial part of reading comprehension!! Andrew picked up what I already knew - he saw the contradiction plain as day!
Cresp, if you had reading and comprehension issues you would not be able to respond to my posts or anyone else's. Your postings would be a complete mess and incomprehensible.
And yet you respond like an NT!
Con artistry EXPOSED!
And if Cresp thinks he's exposing my character flaws he's dreaming! I'm exposing his to the world and he can't do a thing about it because he knows deep down that it's true.
So how did he read Phil's comment, if he can't read the content of paragraphs and pages?
He did say he can't read passages that are a paragraph or longer. If that's the case he wouldn't be able to respond with his vocab to that which he can't read. You can't respond to something if you can't read it, step 1 of reacting to something is being able to comprehend what you are reacting to. Get why it doesn't make sense?
"Then explain to me, Lurker, how the hell you managed to read that long-paragraph written by Phil and give such an eloquently response."
Well, it wasn't that long or unfamiliar. Sometimes when I read things with familiar writing and ideas, I tend to skim through them. And I don't know how much there is to pick up from the ramblings of someone like Phil. And I still have to focus a lot.
Now I can't recall a lot of the stuff I read in that paragraph a while after I stop reading it, but when I look at it again, much of it is familiar. I guess I just pick up some of the basic ideas in what I read. When I read many other things, I think I get lost trying to get it all in and think I miss a lot. I tend to read things a few times over sometimes, and sometimes aren't sure if the meanings are registering in my head as I read through sentences. I myself am not sure how to describe my reading problems and don't really understand them. I managed to write a response because I looked back on the paragraph a few times as I was writing my response.
So great it takes him 3 extra readings, that doesn't equal incapable of doing it. Having to read something more than once isn't preventing him from doing things. He could get additional time to read according to his needs at any public university.
No one will hire him because he's LAZY, Oliver! Prospective employers can see that a mile off! You notice that when I make sense - he calls it ramblings just to make himself look good, when those of us who actually look at the evidence that's right there in plain sight know better! He can't stand that so he makes excuses! That includes this "familiar" argument which is a perfect example of how to be LAZY! It's all it is - laziness to a pathetic degree. He does this intentionally, and I'm even willing to bet that he doesn't want SSI because he won't be able to get it anyway. And he knows it because the SSI system is very strong in picking up con artists! He's even conning you with that BS about a college degree! If he really had reading and comprehension issues he would never have graduated high school!
Billy Cresp is a con artist, a liar and a stupid troll. Pure and simple.
Looks like somebody needs to recognize that he's being descriminated against.
Phil, I don't see how vocabulary is a crucial part of reading comprehension outside of the necessity of knowing some vocabulary in order to read anything. Phil, there's quite a difference between reading posts and responses, some of which are kind of predictable and brief, and reading things that are long and have lots of content and facts.
I often spend lots of time reading posts and responses. I have to concentrate a lot and spend lots of time when I make responses. This is not like reading a book or an article. This is not timed. Post reading isn't much of a learning experience. Stop with this either/or, black/white thinking of yours.
How have I responded like an NT? Really, tell me. What is an NT to you? NT to you seems to be any person who doesn't fit your narrow distorted mold of what someone on the spectrum is like, which basically would resemble you. I strongly doubt you don't make such rigid NT/autism considerations regarding other individuals.
You haven't exposed anything but your whacked out thought once again. You are doing an awful job, over and over, at trying to prove that my reading comprehension is sufficient. You can't resist demonizing me because you're angered that I acknowledge that one has to at least face adult realities and responsibilities even in dire circumstances. You don't want to have to think about that while you indulge in your childish self-loving activities in which you must not be challenged by others. Adults have to think things over, as I had to in order to form opinions. You shoot your ignorant mouth off, refusing to consider any ambiguities, and demand agreement with any faulty idea you come up with. Adults don't have time to fool around making lawsuits against all kinds of people for making fun of them for being a loser. Adults usually don't go around verbally abusing individuals who really don't deserve it, and then go around with not a shred of remorse.
Andrew, there isn't much content to process from Phil's comments. The rantings of a mad man can't have their meanings discerned to a consensus, unless such sayings are analyzed by psychotherapists who are experienced in dealing with psychobabble. I'm not claiming total illiteracy here, and you know it. 3 extra readings doesn't hint to you a reading problem?? Are you kidding me? Actually, reading things over and over, and slowly, does prevent one from doing things. With that extra time, I cannot read yet other things, nor can I do other activities, unless I cut back on reading. I wonder if you really are that tone deaf and out of touch to not understand that basic reality. I don't want additional time to read, as I don't want inflated grades/assessments, which won't mean anything when it comes to getting extra education/employment, and as inflated assessments won't increase my capability to achieve things.
And Phil and Andrew, the both of you, watch what you do to attack me, as I now have an official diagnosis, that I didn't go doctor shopping for. Consider how others may perceive this.
Phil, I don't see how vocabulary is a crucial part of reading comprehension outside of the necessity of knowing some vocabulary in order to read anything. Phil, there's quite a difference between reading posts and responses, some of which are kind of predictable and brief, and reading things that are long and have lots of content and facts.
I often spend lots of time reading posts and responses. I have to concentrate a lot and spend lots of time when I make responses. This is not like reading a book or an article. This is not timed. Post reading isn't much of a learning experience. Stop with this either/or, black/white thinking of yours.
How have I responded like an NT? Really, tell me. What is an NT to you? NT to you seems to be any person who doesn't fit your narrow distorted mold of what someone on the spectrum is like, which basically would resemble you. I strongly doubt you don't make such rigid NT/autism considerations regarding other individuals.
You haven't exposed anything but your whacked out thought once again. You are doing an awful job, over and over, at trying to prove that my reading comprehension is sufficient. You can't resist demonizing me because you're angered that I acknowledge that one has to at least face adult realities and responsibilities even in dire circumstances. You don't want to have to think about that while you indulge in your childish self-loving activities in which you must not be challenged by others. Adults have to think things over, as I had to in order to form opinions. You shoot your ignorant mouth off, refusing to consider any ambiguities, and demand agreement with any faulty idea you come up with. Adults don't have time to fool around making lawsuits against all kinds of people for making fun of them for being a loser. Adults usually don't go around verbally abusing individuals who really don't deserve it, and then go around with not a shred of remorse.
Andrew, there isn't much content to process from Phil's comments. The rantings of a mad man can't have their meanings discerned to a consensus, unless such sayings are analyzed by psychotherapists who are experienced in dealing with psychobabble. I'm not claiming total illiteracy here, and you know it. 3 extra readings doesn't hint to you a reading problem?? Are you kidding me? Actually, reading things over and over, and slowly, does prevent one from doing things. With that extra time, I cannot read yet other things, nor can I do other activities, unless I cut back on reading. I wonder if you really are that tone deaf and out of touch to not understand that basic reality. I don't want additional time to read, as I don't want inflated grades/assessments, which won't mean anything when it comes to getting extra education/employment, and as inflated assessments won't increase my capability to achieve things.
And Phil and Andrew, the both of you, watch what you do to attack me, as I now have an official diagnosis, that I didn't go doctor shopping for. Consider how others may perceive this.
Phil, I don't see how vocabulary is a crucial part of reading comprehension outside of the necessity of knowing some vocabulary in order to read anything. Phil, there's quite a difference between reading posts and responses, some of which are kind of predictable and brief, and reading things that are long and have lots of content and facts.
I often spend lots of time reading posts and responses. I have to concentrate a lot and spend lots of time when I make responses. This is not like reading a book or an article. This is not timed. Post reading isn't much of a learning experience. Stop with this either/or, black/white thinking of yours.
How have I responded like an NT? Really, tell me. What is an NT to you? NT to you seems to be any person who doesn't fit your narrow distorted mold of what someone on the spectrum is like, which basically would resemble you. I strongly doubt you don't make such rigid NT/autism considerations regarding other individuals.
You haven't exposed anything but your whacked out thought once again. You are doing an awful job, over and over, at trying to prove that my reading comprehension is sufficient. You can't resist demonizing me because you're angered that I acknowledge that one has to at least face adult realities and responsibilities even in dire circumstances. You don't want to have to think about that while you indulge in your childish self-loving activities in which you must not be challenged by others. Adults have to think things over, as I had to in order to form opinions. You shoot your ignorant mouth off, refusing to consider any ambiguities, and demand agreement with any faulty idea you come up with. Adults don't have time to fool around making lawsuits against all kinds of people for making fun of them for being a loser. Adults usually don't go around verbally abusing individuals who really don't deserve it, and then go around with not a shred of remorse.
Andrew, there isn't much content to process from Phil's comments. The rantings of a mad man can't have their meanings discerned to a consensus, unless such sayings are analyzed by psychotherapists who are experienced in dealing with psychobabble. I'm not claiming total illiteracy here, and you know it. 3 extra readings doesn't hint to you a reading problem?? Are you kidding me? Actually, reading things over and over, and slowly, does prevent one from doing things. With that extra time, I cannot read yet other things, nor can I do other activities, unless I cut back on reading. I wonder if you really are that tone deaf and out of touch to not understand that basic reality. I don't want additional time to read, as I don't want inflated grades/assessments, which won't mean anything when it comes to getting extra education/employment, and as inflated assessments won't increase my capability to achieve things.
And Phil and Andrew, the both of you, watch what you do to attack me, as I now have an official diagnosis, that I didn't go doctor shopping for. Consider how others may perceive this.
Phil, I don't see how vocabulary is a crucial part of reading comprehension outside of the necessity of knowing some vocabulary in order to read anything. Phil, there's quite a difference between reading posts and responses, some of which are kind of predictable and brief, and reading things that are long and have lots of content and facts.
I often spend lots of time reading posts and responses. I have to concentrate a lot and spend lots of time when I make responses. This is not like reading a book or an article. This is not timed. Post reading isn't much of a learning experience. Stop with this either/or, black/white thinking of yours.
How have I responded like an NT? Really, tell me. What is an NT to you? NT to you seems to be any person who doesn't fit your narrow distorted mold of what someone on the spectrum is like, which basically would resemble you. I strongly doubt you don't make such rigid NT/autism considerations regarding other individuals.
You haven't exposed anything but your whacked out thought once again. You are doing an awful job, over and over, at trying to prove that my reading comprehension is sufficient. You can't resist demonizing me because you're angered that I acknowledge that one has to at least face adult realities and responsibilities even in dire circumstances. You don't want to have to think about that while you indulge in your childish self-loving activities in which you must not be challenged by others. Adults have to think things over, as I had to in order to form opinions. You shoot your ignorant mouth off, refusing to consider any ambiguities, and demand agreement with any faulty idea you come up with. Adults don't have time to fool around making lawsuits against all kinds of people for making fun of them for being a loser. Adults usually don't go around verbally abusing individuals who really don't deserve it, and then go around with not a shred of remorse.
Andrew, there isn't much content to process from Phil's comments. The rantings of a mad man can't have their meanings discerned to a consensus, unless such sayings are analyzed by psychotherapists who are experienced in dealing with psychobabble. I'm not claiming total illiteracy here, and you know it. 3 extra readings doesn't hint to you a reading problem?? Are you kidding me? Actually, reading things over and over, and slowly, does prevent one from doing things. With that extra time, I cannot read yet other things, nor can I do other activities, unless I cut back on reading. I wonder if you really are that tone deaf and out of touch to not understand that basic reality. I don't want additional time to read, as I don't want inflated grades/assessments, which won't mean anything when it comes to getting extra education/employment, and as inflated assessments won't increase my capability to achieve things.
And Phil and Andrew, the both of you, watch what you do to attack me, as I now have an official diagnosis, that I didn't go doctor shopping for. Consider how others may perceive this.
Phil, nobody will hire me because I'm incompetent and have a terrible job history. You're either ignorant of or are choosing to disregard your hypocrisy when you call me lazy. You don't do much important with your time. Umpiring doesn't count for much. You should be doing all you can to get work, even if it means leaving your country to somewhere that doesn't have an insane welfare state that would ban you from working.
I've been working off-the-books jobs that involve pulling out weeds and moving dirt. I spend none of the money on myself, but appropriate it to paying down part of my student loan debt. You do what you want with your government handouts. I don't want them, as I don't like living off the money of taxpayer strangers. That's why I don't want SSI. If I chose not to pursue SSI due to not thinking I could get it, that wouldn't mean I didn't want it. Where is your logic? And in my opinion, SSI in my country goes to quite a few who shouldn't get it. I don't think the bureaucrats who administer it are that savvy when they don't have to be. Whether something being familiar or not makes something easier to read for me, doesn't prove that I'm lazy. I've not chosen to never read things that are difficult for me. Again, you're not using much logic here.
I had to try a lot to pass some of the required exams to graduate high school. And I didn't do very well in high school anyway. There wasn't lots of long and heavy reading in college for me as I had many math and science courses. I put in a lot of effort to complete some of the classes that did require substantial reading. I also went to a tier 3 college, which is somewhere in the lower 50%, and considering my country's mediocre education system, with grade inflation and stuff, one can't rule out a reading comprehension problem in me.
You're contradicting yourself now Oliver, you said that nobody could make an accurate diagnosis online, back on Asspie Hater's blog, but now you call Lurker's diagnosis of psychosis against Phil legitimate (and total pwnage hahaha... douche.)
You're a bigger hypocrite than Glenn Beck.
Andrew, I didn't diagnosis anyone and you know it. It doesn't matter if he's a psycho or not. I don't know. I know that his government knows that his behavior is not that of a mentally stable person fit for society. Stop slandering me. Don't act like a clown with me. Come up with something against me that isn't so flimsy, or shut up about me. Just admit you can't prove whatever you're trying to prove about me, and that you're not messing with someone who will put up with your nonsense. I'm not some dope at your college who will just go along with whatever nonsense you say.
Oliver, I don't know if I have actual legal recourse against him, and I'm not the type to sue all who hurl insults and lies about me. I wonder if he knows he's not the first person to make phony accusations about me. I don't think I really have the time or the legal knowledge to start a lawsuit.
Umpiring counts for PLENTY, Cresp!! It's a struggle to get umpires because it's such a difficult thing to do. Never ever undermine it's importance to a very important part of the Australian culture!!
I can't leave Australia. I am medically unable to do so. Fact.
And Canby, the CMO said "medically" unfit - not mentally. Cresp never owned me. He applies logic in a manner that totally lacks logic - the calling card of a con artist trying to make out he's dumb. The world knows better, and he failed to address one scrap of what I exposed him for - a lazy little moron who is paying for being lazy with that terrible work history.
Reality check - I challenged Cresp to tell me where he was getting voc rehab back in January. He refused. The real reason? He wasn't doing anything of the sort, and is afraid I'll find that out. I'll bet he won't even reveal which high school he went to for the same reason. He'll lie again and won't tell me to hide the fact.
You at least showed some courage in that regard, so as far as your life in general is concerned you have a better rep of telling the truth.
Not something I would credit Cresp with.
Well Phil, when you can pay enough of your bills through umpiring, you can be considered to be doing enough work. How are you medically unable to leave Australia? I have clarified a lot of what I have said regarding myself, but you won't respond to that, so you're left with hardly anything to diminish my credibility. Saying lazy over and over isn't going to make it easier, except when trying to persuade those who are convinced by repetition of a claim. My work history is due to my incompetence and unemployability. You don't have any evidence to prove I'm lazy, and I think you get off angering me by saying I'm lazy.
I wouldn't tell you where I was getting services. How gullible do you think I am considering I know your reputation for causing trouble for others? I won't have you trying to contact entities that I've gone to which have me on record. If you think I haven't been to places for services, why did you acknowledge that I received a diagnosis by a therapist picked by the government, even though you disagreed with the diagnosis? I'm not risking whatever you want to attempt to ruin for me, just to prove to you my circumstances.
Oliver, I appreciate your encouragement about pursuing litigation. I would have to consider it. I don't know how Phil would pay anything to me. I also think his other victims, would be highly deserving of restitution compared to me. I would want them to receive money first.
Nothing illegal about me contacting your mother. Call it douchebaggery, I'd disagree with you on that, but douhebaggery is perfectly legal.
It wasn't harrassment, I wasn't even talking to you, jackass.
I didn't prank call you, nor your mother, and you damn well know it you sorry little pissant. I called to notify your mother, to make sure she was aware of all the stupid shit you say on the blogosphere.
Everything you say when it comes to legal shit is about as truthful as the story of Jesus, a bunch of complete bullshit.
you pressing charges? LOL this is how you sound like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NZtGz_7WI0
Post a Comment